#author("2021-06-12T19:23:50+09:00","","")
[[TopPage]]
#author("2021-06-12T19:26:30+09:00","","")

There are very different views on @ Zhu Jiyu's answer. Take what Microsoft Research Institute has done to illustrate that the internal culture of Microsoft is technology led, or that the technology guru entertains himself, which is far from the fact. As a matter of fact, Microsoft's internal research institute and engineering team are very separate, and hardly have much influence. None of the products you see come directly from the Research Institute. Many technologies benefit from the research achievements of the Research Institute, but the decision on product orientation, technology selection, architecture and user experience has nothing to do with the Research Institute. In this case, I really can't agree to use the style of Research Institute to represent the overall culture of Microsoft, so as to explain whether the product is not good enough. In fact, Google's internal culture is more like what Zhu Jiyu described. The opinions of engineers and technical experts play a decisive role. The company can play with a lot of cool things that have nothing to do with its current business, such as driverless, Gbps network, Google glasses Microsoft is a very commercial software company genetically. Making money is always the first priority. Although Bill Gates is a technical genius, his technical genius is engineering rather than academic. And then back to the question itself. On the technical level, @ Wang Zhuhao said very well that it is very difficult to do it on the original bloated code base if we want to be compatible forward and meet the standards. If we write a new one, we will not have any responsibilityI believe the browser of he's historical burden will be much better. At the team level, after IE6, the IE team was actually disbanded, because the market share was already very high at that time. Commercially speaking, it was not worth investing. At that time, there was no competitor. So the leadership naturally felt that there was no good investment in this field. (this just shows Microsoft's commercialization gene. If you make something, you must give me ROI. If it's not worth it, you don't do it.). Then a few years later, Firefox came out, but Microsoft's response to this is as slow as ever, because Microsoft has always been used to this idea, you do it first, well done, we have to catch up with you, it's very easy to surpass you. This is the confidence brought by so many experiences in the past (think about Netscape, Borland...). After the real success of Firefox, Microsoft reconstituted the IE team to do it. We can imagine how difficult it is for a group of people who originally knew nothing about this product code base to take over. The pace of understanding the original pile of things, refactoring, bug modification, testing and publishing, is too slow compared with those competitors without historical burden, such as Firefox and chrome. That is to say, from this moment on, Microsoft found that its late strike routine did not work (and then failed again and again). Windows and office are the lifeblood of Microsoft, which is also one of the reasons why innovation is not enough. All new products mustYou need to match and integrate with Windows Office. If you get in the way of windows / office, I'm sorry, no matter how good the product is, it will be cut. Think of courier... Internally, new products can easily fall victim to Windows / office. Of course, Microsoft is aware of these problems, but it's easy to talk about them, but it's extremely difficult to solve them. No one dares to give up these two money trees, even if everyone thinks they can't make money forever. ----------------------Supplement: ---   think of some reasons:   Microsoft has to do a lot of extra work for a product. For example, if you want to launch a product, you must support all kinds of languages, and the security must be very high. There is a thing called common engineer criteria in Microsoft. When all products are released, they must meet all the standards defined in it, including political correctness Map does not use its own Bing map for each country, which may lead to political disputes), accessibility, security, performance, compatibility of various technical standards and so on, adding up to hundreds of pages of documents. These things, ordinary users can not see, but enThe cost of this is very high. And a new product of a start-up company can completely ignore these, V1 only releases English? No problem, other languages will be added later. Is there a security hole? Please, let's see how many security loopholes windows has, what are we...   so in the consumer market, Microsoft's response speed in this respect must not match that of small companies. This also explains that Microsoft is now very successful in the enterprise market, but the consumer market is left behind by others. Because enterprise customers are relatively conservative, and the features mentioned above are necessary for enterprise products, you can see Microsoft's recent financial report that the profit and revenue of enterprise server tools department increase rapidly every year. I don't think ie is as bad as you think.   I think one of the important functions of IE is to let viewers use IE to download chrome and Firefox after re installing the system. Then ie this small blue window is very rare to appear on your screen. Why do people black IE? Why do people say that people who use IE have low IQ? Why don't some people use IE to kill them? In such an era of unprecedented amount of information, the browser as a very important channel of information exchange with the Internet, how can you call Microsoft such a black IE. In the final analysis,   I think your IE version is too low! People black IE and say IE browser is bad and bad. If I insist on asking you, what's the differencewhere? You ask yourself the difference of IE, how many points can you answer? The idea of poor IE has bothered me for many years. As a teenager majoring in computer science, sometimes my sister asks me what is the difference in ie, but I can't answer it, which makes me feel very embarrassed (in my heart). What can I say? The advantage of chrome may be the disadvantage of IE. Slow? Three days later, we should look at each other with new eyes. The same is true for software. Is it true to compare ie on ie6-9 with the latest Chrome? Why is the update of IE so slow? We all know that the binding of IE and win system has only been sold for several decades. Rival Chrome has released more than 30 versions in three years. With XP, win7 and IE6 ~ 9, the latest chrome30 + will be installed. Naturally, there is no comparability between the two. You will think that IE design is old, can't catch up with the times, ie running speed is slow. There is a problem with IE that cannot be solved. As time goes on, the idea that IE is bad is deeply rooted in your heart. Even if you update the latest windows and use the new version of ie11, you will still habitually use IE to download chrome, and then ie will quietly lie in your C disk, a folder in the dark. Is the latest ie still slow? The world's martial arts, only fast ~   1. Start speed   "cold start" testTry to measure the time it takes to load the browser for the first time after the computer restarts. The timer starts when the browser is started, and stops when the user is able to enter text in the browser user interface (UI). The "non cold start" test measures the time it takes to load the browser after the computer restarts rather than for the first time. The timer starts when the browser is started, and stops when the user is able to enter text in the browser user interface (UI). To put it bluntly, cold start is the first time to start the machine. Hot start is to turn it on and off once. And then turn on the time (also our most commonly used)   What ie hot start chart does not show? Don't lie to yourself. Ie11 has achieved almost instant success through the perfect combination of system and software. It's no surprise for a big company like Microsoft. Compared with the old version of IE and other browsers, ie11 has made full progress. Compared with other versions of Microsoft browser, the most important improvement of ie11 is to shorten the page loading time (whether loading pages from server or cache), as well as the cold / hot start time. In the test, it only takes 0.01463 seconds to start ie11! ——More than 280 times faster than opera. I think chrome 0.98 seconds, ie 0.01 seconds, I think ie should be in the start-up speed of this win. 2. Page loading   open the browser, clear the cache and display the blank page（ about:blank ）In this state, the "page loading time (non cache loading)" test can be usedMeasure the time it takes for the browser to fully load a complex page. The timing starts when the user presses the "OK" key in the browser address bar, and stops when the test page is fully loaded (the test page will prompt the "load" event). When the browser is open and the test page has been loaded in a single tag, the page load time (load from cache) test can measure the time taken by the browser to reload a complex page. Start timing by pressing F5 (refresh) key, and stop timing when the test page is fully loaded (the test page will prompt "load" event). We browse a new webpage, open a new activity interface of Jingdong, open a new answer of Zhihu, and view an interesting knowledge of the shell. (there is no cache in these cases  in theory, ie is faster than chrome, which should be the most commonly used one in our daily life) it has been criticized as slow to death. 3. Memory usage    "basic memory usage (blank label)" test can measure the browser opening a single blank page（ about:blank ）Memory used. The "memory usage (open 10 Tags)" test can measure the memory used by browsers when they open 10 Tags and each tag displays the home page of mainstream websites. The memory killer of chrome is really not a false name ~ compared with ie, it is much better.   4. Data viewed by professionals    (data source Midas, analysis and reconstruction from fake Zhuge Liang)   5. Plug in   IE has plug-ins! Ie officialApplication market   advertisement blocking   Adblock plus    Huihui assistant Huihui shopping assistant   pocket    you can think of and use almost everything. (after all, there is demand, there is supply)   and the reading mode of IE    Zhihu's friends told me loudly, do you like this function? 6 interface and design   this place may not be easy to talk about, because everyone's aesthetic is different. I can't say good-looking is good-looking.   let's make a comparison and let you see for yourself. Don't comment on beauty   7. Break down   don't tell me your chrome hasn't broken down. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -   give you so much data   if you finish reading, you will have a scale in your heart   is ie really that bad? It should not be   I think deep-rooted psychological reasons may account for some factors. Halo effect   to sum up, I personally think ie11 is an excellent browser. (I don't dare to say too much, which programming language is the best one will easily lead to such a problem).    anyway, I think ie is very good. " If he wants to argue with you, show him this article.   by: fake Zhuge Liang 16:34:14 August 10, 2014————————-   read the comments to add a few points  people are used to the synchronization of Chrome's favorites. After the system is reinstalled, install chrome and log in to an account to synchronize the favorites. But have you found that Ms accounts are also very powerful, even inadvertently. Log in to an account of MS when installing the system. My windows personal settings. Desktop settings, SkyDrive. Visual Stdio。 Office。 Of course, it also includes ie favorites. They all synchronize what people think ie is not good enough. It's true. IE has its drawbacks. But don't compare the old version of IE6 ~ 9 with the latest chrome, it's unfair to IE! There is also a small detail, ie page turning animation is much smoother than chrome. (oh, I can't say it, so try it yourself (-? -;)  first of all, you have to question the question raised by the question owner. It depends on your evaluation criteria. Under some standards of "good enough, not good enough", the question of the subject itself does not hold. The performance and power consumption ratio of ie11 on low-voltage processor's tablet and ultrabook is not comparable to that of chrome. For example, my surface Pro 3 can easily output 1080p B station video to 1440p monitor with IE 11, even if the frequency is limited to 1GHz, it will not drop frame stuck. You try chrome I will use IE decisively when I need to consider the performance power ratio. But you don't have to think about it on the desktop,Chrome. However, I tried the edge of win 10 10158 for a while yesterday. If nothing happens, the day of abandoning Chrome is not far away. I am not a soft pink, and I even have a higher recognition of Google. However, a group of people use XP to hack windows and ie all day long, which is really hard to bear. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Update: someone released a performance test result of sunspider of the latest version of edge vs chrome in / R / windows 10 of reddit today. I didn't read it carefully, but the general conclusion is that the performance of edge is better than project Spartan period has been greatly improved, and it has not lost chrome at all. I don't know much about this test, welcome to correct me, link to [10158] edge vs chrome  you all know that you need to upgrade chrome, Firefox, opera and other browsers to the latest version, or even use IE to open the official website to download the installation package, but you don't want to upgrade Internet Explorer, and you don't want to open automatic update. IEIt means that this pot is very painful. In the era of IE 6, HTML5 has not been written yet, and safari has not been written yet...  - - -  Safari 8's HTML5 compatibility score is similar to that of IE 11. How can no one say Safari is bad? IE6 is really excellent in his time. IE7, IE8 can not wash white, is the result of their own lack of enterprising. IE9 has started to make a huge improvement, the most obvious of which is its support for HTML5. After that, ie10 and ie11 have no obvious disadvantage in the same period. But at this time, a large number of users are used to chrome, and their impression of IE is the ie before 8.
https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/team_display.php?teamid=1873911
http://sc.sie.gov.hk/TuniS/6042ba2449e68.site123.me/blog/it-s-not-hard-to-earn-a-million-dollars-a-year-just-knock-on-the-door-with-these-information-security-certificates
http://www.astro.wisc.edu/?URL=spotoclub101.weebly.com/spoto-club/latest-az
https://www.allrecipes.com/cook/29726594/
https://www.wattpad.com/user/zonevision9

IP:240b:11:e6e1:a200:f852:381a:8340:8d17 TIME:"2021-06-12 (土) 19:26:30" REFERER:"https://yakuza.wiki/?cmd=edit&page=Microsoft+cstodr" USER_AGENT:"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.101 Safari/537.36"
トップ   編集 差分 バックアップ 添付 複製 名前変更 リロード   新規 一覧 検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS